Washington 's comparative negligence law means that the parties share blame for negligence are all potential, but must be a child when the behavior of A. This means that a child may have acted negligently and was therefore deemed to be wholly or partly responsible for the damage and harm children. In Washington, the question of the degree of neglect of children can also be called "contributory negligence". But there are some limitations when it comes toAccidents and injuries, neglect. Washington's first law is that children under 6 are held negligent as a matter of law. The Washington State Supreme Court ruled that a child under 6 years, mental capacity, their negligence. This means that whenever a child under 6 years, a lawsuit for damages caused by an accident that the child is a disorder in view of decision assumes the parties neglectcaused the injuries to the child.
For ages 6 and older can be classified as negligence and therefore legally responsible for their own injuries. But there is one important difference. In Washington, children are the adults are not judged by the same rules apply to, That We previously defined the standard of negligence for adults, as the failure of ordinary care Circumstances under similar or same year, at the time of the accident or accident.In children, however, the fault standard is defined very narrowly. A child is negligent if the child is normal due diligence as a precautionary measure, it would be reasonable child the same age, intelligence, maturity, not training and experience "to perform the same or similar circumstances. This is a very important distinction. This means that there is a child of seven years with the same criteria could apply to a child of 10 years can be estimated.
The standard of negligenceChildren are also highly dependent on individual characteristics of children and property. It is conceivable, if the actions of a special needs child or mentally disabled only on the basis of expected behavior with other children of any age to assess itself and / or mental abilities. The same is true for children, advanced or high-functioning as possible. Top children with achieving the highest score should be judged by the activities of other children in similar situations.
No comments:
Post a Comment